ASSERTYVE.ORG

What is Distributive Negotiation?

Distributive negotiation is a type of negotiation where one party tries to maximize their gains at the expense of the other party. This approach is often referred to as “win-lose” or “zero-sum” negotiation. In distributive negotiation, the parties involved have conflicting interests, and the goal is to get the best possible outcome for oneself, even if it means the other party loses.

For example, in a salary negotiation, an employee may try to get the highest possible salary, while the employer may try to pay the lowest possible amount. This type of negotiation is often competitive and adversarial, with each party trying to outmaneuver the other.

In distributive negotiation, the focus is on individual gain, and the negotiation process is often characterized by:

• Competitive behavior

• Limited communication

• A focus on individual interests

• A win-lose outcome

What is Integrative Negotiation?

Integrative negotiation, on the other hand, is a type of negotiation where both parties work together to find a mutually beneficial solution. This approach is often referred to as “win-win” negotiation. In integrative negotiation, the parties involved have complementary interests, and the goal is to find a solution that satisfies both parties.

For example, in a business partnership, two companies may negotiate a deal that benefits both parties. This type of negotiation is often collaborative and cooperative, with both parties working together to find a solution that meets their shared interests.

In integrative negotiation, the focus is on mutual gain, and the negotiation process is often characterized by:

• Collaborative behavior

• Open communication

• A focus on shared interests

• A win-win outcome

Key Differences Between Distributive and Integrative Negotiation

So, what are the key differences between distributive and integrative negotiation? Here are some key takeaways:

• Focus: Distributive negotiation focuses on individual gain, while integrative negotiation focuses on mutual gain.

• Behavior: Distributive negotiation is often competitive and adversarial, while integrative negotiation is collaborative and cooperative.

• Communication: Distributive negotiation is characterized by limited communication, while integrative negotiation is characterized by open communication.

• Outcome: Distributive negotiation often results in a win-lose outcome, while integrative negotiation results in a win-win outcome.

When to Use Distributive Negotiation

While integrative negotiation is often the preferred approach, there are situations where distributive negotiation may be necessary. Here are some scenarios where distributive negotiation may be appropriate:

• Limited resources: When resources are scarce, distributive negotiation may be necessary to ensure that one’s own interests are protected.

• Competitive environments: In highly competitive environments, distributive negotiation may be necessary to stay ahead of the competition.

• Short-term goals: When short-term goals are the priority, distributive negotiation may be necessary to achieve those goals.

When to Use Integrative Negotiation

On the other hand, integrative negotiation is often the preferred approach in many situations. Here are some scenarios where integrative negotiation may be appropriate:

• Long-term relationships: When building long-term relationships is the priority, integrative negotiation is often the best approach.

• Complex problems: When complex problems need to be solved, integrative negotiation can help to find creative solutions.

• Mutual benefit: When both parties have complementary interests, integrative negotiation can help to find a mutually beneficial solution.

Best Practices for Effective Negotiation

Regardless of whether you’re using distributive or integrative negotiation, here are some best practices for effective negotiation:

• Prepare thoroughly: Research the other party’s interests and goals, and prepare a clear and concise negotiation strategy.

• Communicate effectively: Listen actively and communicate clearly to avoid misunderstandings.

• Be flexible: Be open to creative solutions and willing to compromise.

• Build trust: Establish trust with the other party to build a strong foundation for negotiation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, distributive and integrative negotiation are two different approaches to negotiation, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. While distributive negotiation may be necessary in certain situations, integrative negotiation is often the preferred approach in many scenarios. By understanding the key differences between these two approaches and following best practices for effective negotiation, you can become a more effective negotiator and achieve better outcomes.

FAQ

What is the main difference between distributive and integrative negotiation?

The main difference between distributive and integrative negotiation is the focus of the negotiation. Distributive negotiation focuses on individual gain, while integrative negotiation focuses on mutual gain.

When should I use distributive negotiation?

You should use distributive negotiation when resources are scarce, in competitive environments, or when short-term goals are the priority.

What are the key characteristics of integrative negotiation?

The key characteristics of integrative negotiation are collaborative behavior, open communication, a focus on shared interests, and a win-win outcome.

How can I prepare for effective negotiation?

You can prepare for effective negotiation by researching the other party’s interests and goals, preparing a clear and concise negotiation strategy, communicating effectively, being flexible, and building trust.