Distributive negotiation is a type of negotiation where one party tries to maximize their gains at the expense of the other party. In this article, we’ll delve into the world of distributive negotiation, exploring its definition, types, strategies, and examples.
What is Distributive Negotiation?
Distributive negotiation is a competitive approach to negotiation where the goal is to get the best possible outcome for oneself, often at the expense of the other party. This type of negotiation is also known as “win-lose” or “zero-sum” negotiation, as one party’s gain is equal to the other party’s loss. In distributive negotiation, the parties involved have different goals and interests, and the negotiation process is often adversarial.
Distributive negotiation is commonly used in situations where there is a fixed pie to be divided, such as in business deals, salary negotiations, or real estate transactions. In these situations, one party tries to get the largest possible share of the pie, while the other party tries to minimize their losses.
Examples of Distributive Negotiation
Distributive negotiation is all around us. Here are a few examples:
-
A car buyer trying to negotiate the lowest possible price with a salesperson.
-
A company negotiating with a supplier to get the best possible deal on raw materials.
-
A employee negotiating a salary increase with their employer.
In each of these examples, one party is trying to maximize their gains at the expense of the other party.
Types of Distributive Negotiation
There are several types of distributive negotiation, including:
1. Distributive Bargaining
Distributive bargaining is a type of distributive negotiation where the parties involved negotiate over a fixed amount of resources, such as money or goods. This type of negotiation is often used in business deals, labor disputes, and international trade agreements.
2. Integrative Bargaining
Integrative bargaining is a type of distributive negotiation where the parties involved try to find a mutually beneficial solution. This type of negotiation is often used in situations where the parties have a long-term relationship, such as in business partnerships or joint ventures.
3. Competitive Bargaining
Competitive bargaining is a type of distributive negotiation where the parties involved compete against each other to get the best possible deal. This type of negotiation is often used in situations where there are multiple buyers or sellers, such as in real estate transactions or online auctions.
Strategies for Distributive Negotiation
Here are some strategies for distributive negotiation:
1. Know Your BATNA
BATNA stands for “Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement.” Knowing your BATNA gives you a clear idea of what you’re willing to accept and what you’re willing to walk away from. This can give you a strong bargaining position in distributive negotiation.
2. Make a Strong First Offer
Making a strong first offer can set the tone for the rest of the negotiation. A strong first offer can also give you a psychological advantage, as the other party may be more likely to accept your offer or make a counteroffer that is closer to your target.
3. Use Time to Your Advantage
Time can be a powerful tool in distributive negotiation. Taking time to think about an offer or making the other party wait for a response can give you an advantage. This can also give you time to gather more information or consult with others.
4. Use Objective Criteria
Using objective criteria, such as market data or industry standards, can help to support your negotiation position. This can also help to build trust and credibility with the other party.
Examples of Distributive Negotiation in Real Life
Here are a few examples of distributive negotiation in real life:
-
In 2019, the United States and China engaged in a trade war, with each country imposing tariffs on the other’s goods. This is an example of distributive negotiation on a large scale.
-
In the business world, companies often engage in distributive negotiation with their suppliers to get the best possible deal on raw materials or services.
-
In the world of sports, athletes and their agents often engage in distributive negotiation with team owners to get the best possible contract.
FAQ
What is the difference between distributive and integrative negotiation?
Distributive negotiation is a competitive approach to negotiation where one party tries to maximize their gains at the expense of the other party. Integrative negotiation, on the other hand, is a collaborative approach to negotiation where the parties involved try to find a mutually beneficial solution.
Is distributive negotiation always adversarial?
Not always. While distributive negotiation can be adversarial, it can also be a collaborative process where the parties involved work together to find a solution that benefits both parties.
Can distributive negotiation be used in personal relationships?
Yes. Distributive negotiation can be used in personal relationships, such as in salary negotiations or when buying a car. However, it’s important to remember that distributive negotiation can be adversarial, and may not be the best approach in all situations.
Conclusion
Distributive negotiation is a type of negotiation where one party tries to maximize their gains at the expense of the other party. While it can be a competitive and adversarial process, it can also be a collaborative and mutually beneficial one. By understanding the types, strategies, and examples of distributive negotiation, you can become a more effective negotiator and get what you want in any situation. Remember to always know your BATNA, make a strong first offer, use time to your advantage, and use objective criteria to support your negotiation position.
Team Assertyve
